Skip to main content

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, release 5.2.0

How Identity and Access Management Supports NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 is the control catalog that FedRAMP baselines and many federal programs build on. Two of its families, Access Control (AC) and Identification and Authentication (IA), describe work that identity and access management teams do every day. This matrix lists every active AC and IA control and enhancement in release 5.2.0, including NIST 800-53 AC-2 (Account Management) and each of its active enhancements, plus a short set of identity-relevant controls from the AU, PS and SC families. For each row it quotes NIST's control statement and shows whether identity work is typically the primary implementation, a supporting input to a control another team owns, or outside identity scope (GCA classification).

Baseline membership is shown as its own facet. Each row states the lowest FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline list that includes the control, and whether it appears in the NIST SP 800-53B baselines. These lists are reference points for system owners. They say nothing about whether any cloud service or GCA engagement holds a FedRAMP authorization. This page is a mapping aid prepared by GCA, a practice opinion dated October 16, 2026, not legal advice and not an attestation.

For CIOs and compliance leaders

Information as of Last verified NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, release 5.2.0 (August 27, 2025) Version 1

Reference material, not a compliance determination. This matrix reflects GCA's practice view as of . It does not certify, warrant or predict the outcome of any assessment, audit or examination. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls. Read the full notice.

The matrix

  • Primary
  • Supporting
  • Outside identity scope (GCA classification)

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5: identity-relevant controls identity traceability matrix. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, release 5.2.0 (August 27, 2025). Information as of October 16, 2026.
Requirement Requirement text Control type / FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline / SP 800-53B baseline Identity relevance (GCA classification) GCA approach Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities Evidence commonly examined
AC-2 AC: Access Control

Account Management

a. Define and document the types of accounts allowed and specifically prohibited for use within the system;

b. Assign account managers;

c. Require [Assignment: organization-defined prerequisites and criteria] for group and role membership;

d. Specify:

1. Authorized users of the system;

2. Group and role membership; and

3. Access authorizations (i.e., privileges) and [Assignment: organization-defined attributes (as required)] for each account;

e. Require approvals by [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] for requests to create accounts;

f. Create, enable, modify, disable, and remove accounts in accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined policy, procedures, prerequisites, and criteria];

g. Monitor the use of accounts;

h. Notify account managers and [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] within:

1. [Assignment: organization-defined time period] when accounts are no longer required;

2. [Assignment: organization-defined time period] when users are terminated or transferred; and

3. [Assignment: organization-defined time period] when system usage or need-to-know changes for an individual;

i. Authorize access to the system based on:

1. A valid access authorization;

2. Intended system usage; and

3. [Assignment: organization-defined attributes (as required)];

j. Review accounts for compliance with account management requirements [Assignment: organization-defined frequency];

k. Establish and implement a process for changing shared or group account authenticators (if deployed) when individuals are removed from the group; and

l. Align account management processes with personnel termination and transfer processes.

In practice: HR events create, change and remove accounts in a lifecycle workflow, every account has a named owner, and managers often review their team's accounts on a quarterly schedule.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Role Mining Engine

Account management is typically implemented through HR-driven lifecycle workflows, account ownership by correlation, scheduled access reviews, and inactive-account handling.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Account inventory reconciled to the authoritative HR source
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
  • Certification campaign export with per-reviewer decisions
  • Dormant and orphan account report with actions taken
AC-2(1) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Automated System Account Management

Support the management of system accounts using [Assignment: organization-defined automated mechanisms].

In practice: Connectors create, change and disable accounts directly from the HR record, and a scheduled reconciliation job flags any account that no longer matches its source.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Automated account management commonly means provisioning connectors and reconciliation jobs that create, change and disable accounts from the authoritative source.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
  • Account-to-identity correlation report with unowned accounts
AC-2(2) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management

Automatically [Selection: remove; disable] temporary and emergency accounts after [Assignment: organization-defined time period for each type of account].

In practice: A contractor's temporary account is created with an end date and switches off on that date automatically, so nobody has to remember to remove it.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Temporary and emergency accounts commonly carry an automatic expiry date set at creation, enforced by the lifecycle platform or by time-bound privileged assignments.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Expiry attribute report for temporary and emergency accounts
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Dormant and orphan account report with actions taken
AC-2(3) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Disable Accounts

Disable accounts within [Assignment: organization-defined time period] when the accounts:

(a) Have expired;

(b) Are no longer associated with a user or individual;

(c) Are in violation of organizational policy; or

(d) Have been inactive for [Assignment: organization-defined time period].

In practice: A scheduled job disables accounts that expired or have not signed in for a long stretch, and the few kept on purpose are listed with a reason and an owner.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Assess

Disablement of inactive and expired accounts is commonly automated from last-sign-in and lifecycle-state data, with exceptions recorded.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Dormant-account detection report with disable actions
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
AC-2(4) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Automated Audit Actions

Automatically audit account creation, modification, enabling, disabling, and removal actions.

In practice: Every account creation, change, disablement and removal is written to an audit log and sent to the security team's monitoring tool for review.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Account creation, modification, enabling, disabling and removal events are commonly captured in identity provider and governance audit logs and forwarded for review.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
AC-2(7) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Privileged User Accounts

(a) Establish and administer privileged user accounts in accordance with [Selection: a role-based access scheme; an attribute-based access scheme];

(b) Monitor privileged role or attribute assignments;

(c) Monitor changes to roles or attributes; and

(d) Revoke access when privileged role or attribute assignments are no longer appropriate.

In practice: Administrators use separate admin accounts, hold privileged roles only when needed, and the small group with those roles is reviewed on a regular schedule.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Assess
  • Role Mining Engine

Privileged user accounts are commonly administered under a role-based or attribute-based scheme, with just-in-time rather than standing assignments, separate administrative identities, monitoring of privileged assignments and changes to them, and removal when an assignment is no longer appropriate.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Privileged role assignment report with activation and time-limit settings
  • Role and entitlement catalogue with owners
  • Administrative account standard and inventory of separate administrative identities
AC-2(9) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Restrictions on Use of Shared and Group Accounts

Only permit the use of shared and group accounts that meet [Assignment: organization-defined conditions for establishing shared and group accounts].

In practice: A shared account turns up in a correlation report, gets a named owner and a written reason, and where allowed, is checked out from a vault so each use traces to one person.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement

Shared and group accounts are commonly found by correlation, justified and owned, and where permitted, placed behind credential check-out and session attribution.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Shared-account register with owner and justification
  • Account-to-identity correlation report with unowned accounts
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
  • Service account and workload identity inventory with owners
AC-2(11) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Usage Conditions

Enforce [Assignment: organization-defined circumstances and/or usage conditions] for [Assignment: organization-defined system accounts].

In practice: Sign-in rules limit sensitive accounts to approved locations and managed devices, so an administrator account is blocked from an unusual place.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Usage conditions are commonly expressed as policy-based access rules on location, device and risk signals, and time-bound assignments where needed.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Policy export showing usage conditions by account type
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
AC-2(12) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Account Monitoring for Atypical Usage

(a) Monitor system accounts for [Assignment: organization-defined atypical usage]; and

(b) Report atypical usage of system accounts to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles].

In practice: Sign-in analytics flag unusual account activity, such as a login from a new country at 3 a.m., and the alert goes to a named team with a defined reporting path.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Atypical account usage is commonly monitored through identity risk detections and sign-in analytics, with a defined reporting path.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Risk detection configuration and alert routing record
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
AC-2(13) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Disable Accounts for High-risk Individuals

Disable accounts of individuals within [Assignment: organization-defined time period] of discovery of [Assignment: organization-defined significant risks].

In practice: When HR or the security team flags a high-risk individual, a fast-track lifecycle action disables their accounts within the time the organization has set.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Disabling accounts for high-risk individuals is commonly an expedited lifecycle action triggered by a defined HR or security signal.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Expedited disable procedure and trigger records
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
  • Identity risk detection configuration and alert records
AC-3 AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement

Enforce approved authorizations for logical access to information and system resources in accordance with applicable access control policies.

In practice: Access to an application comes from group or role membership granted through an approved request, and the sign-in service checks that membership each time someone tries to open it.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Role Mining Engine

Access enforcement is commonly implemented through role and group based authorization at the identity provider and application, with policy-based conditions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Role and group to application assignment export
  • Role and entitlement catalogue with owners
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
AC-3(7) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Role-based Access Control

Enforce a role-based access control policy over defined subjects and objects and control access based upon [Assignment: organization-defined roles and users authorized to assume such roles].

In practice: Teams analyze who holds which access, build a reviewed catalogue of job-based roles, and map each role to the entitlements it grants so access follows the job.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Role Mining Engine

Role-based access control is typically implemented through role mining, a reviewed role catalogue and role-to-entitlement mapping.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Role catalogue with owners and entitlement mappings
AC-3(8) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Revocation of Access Authorizations

Enforce the revocation of access authorizations resulting from changes to the security attributes of subjects and objects based on [Assignment: organization-defined rules governing the timing of revocations of access authorizations].

In practice: When someone changes jobs or a reviewer says no, the access is removed through the same workflow, and the time between the event and the removal is tracked.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Revocation of access authorizations is commonly driven by lifecycle events and review decisions, with timeliness measured from the event.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Revocation event records with time from trigger to removal
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
  • Certification campaign export with per-reviewer decisions
AC-3(13) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Attribute-based Access Control

Enforce attribute-based access control policy over defined subjects and objects and control access based upon [Assignment: organization-defined attributes to assume access permissions].

In practice: HR attributes like department, location and worker type feed dynamic groups, so a nurse and an accountant get different access automatically from their record.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Assess
  • Role Mining Engine

Attribute-based access control is commonly implemented with authoritative identity attributes feeding dynamic groups and policy conditions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Dynamic group rules and attribute source mapping
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
  • Role and entitlement catalogue with owners
AC-5 AC: Access Control

Separation of Duties

a. Identify and document [Assignment: organization-defined duties of individuals requiring separation]; and

b. Define system access authorizations to support separation of duties.

In practice: The business lists conflicting duties, such as creating and paying a vendor, and the request workflow blocks that combination or sends it for exception sign-off with a compensating check.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Role Mining Engine

Separation of duties is commonly implemented as defined conflict rules, preventive checks at request time, detective violation reports and approved exceptions with mitigating controls.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Separation-of-duties policy, violation report and exception approvals
  • Role and entitlement catalogue with owners
AC-6 AC: Access Control

Least Privilege

Employ the principle of least privilege, allowing only authorized accesses for users (or processes acting on behalf of users) that are necessary to accomplish assigned organizational tasks.

In practice: Access is scoped to what each job needs: roles are designed narrowly, managers recertify access on a schedule, and extra rights are granted for a limited time.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Role Mining Engine

Least privilege is commonly pursued through role design, periodic access review and just-in-time elevation for privileged access.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Access review results with revocations
  • Role and entitlement catalogue with owners
  • Certification campaign export with per-reviewer decisions
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
AC-6(1) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Authorize Access to Security Functions

Authorize access for [Assignment: organization-defined individuals or roles] to:

(a) [Assignment: organization-defined security functions (deployed in hardware, software, and firmware)]; and

(b) [Assignment: organization-defined security-relevant information].

In practice: Rights to change security settings sit in a few named privileged roles, each with an approval step and a short, known list of people who can hold it.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Authorization of access to security functions is commonly implemented as named privileged roles with approval, held by a limited population.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • List of principals permitted to hold security-function roles
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Administrative account standard and inventory of separate administrative identities
AC-6(2) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Non-privileged Access for Nonsecurity Functions

Require that users of system accounts (or roles) with access to [Assignment: organization-defined security functions or security-relevant information] use non-privileged accounts or roles, when accessing nonsecurity functions.

In practice: Administrators read email and browse the web with a normal account, and switch to a separate admin account only when they perform security work.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Implement

Non-privileged access for non-security functions is commonly implemented with separate administrative identities and privileged access workstations.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Administrator account standard and separate-identity inventory
AC-6(5) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Privileged Accounts

Restrict privileged accounts on the system to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles].

In practice: Only people in defined roles can hold privileged accounts; the list is tied to job role, and an access review checks that it still matches.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Assess
  • Role Mining Engine

Restriction of privileged accounts to defined personnel or roles is commonly implemented through a defined list of who may hold privileged roles and access review.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Administrative account standard and inventory of separate administrative identities
  • Role and entitlement catalogue with owners
AC-6(6) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Privileged Access by Non-organizational Users

Prohibit privileged access to the system by non-organizational users.

In practice: Members of the public who sign in to agency portals are held in a separate account population, policy blocks administrator role assignment to that population, and a review looks for any that were granted by mistake.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement

Privileged access to the system by non-organizational users is prohibited. Separating the accounts of non-organizational users (people without employee-equivalent status under the organization's own rules) from administrative roles, and reviewing for exceptions, commonly contributes to preventing it.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • SailPoint ISC
Evidence commonly examined
  • Report of privileged role assignments held by external accounts that lack organizational-user status (expected empty)
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Procedure for granting organizational-user status to contractors
AC-6(7) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Review of User Privileges

(a) Review [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] the privileges assigned to [Assignment: organization-defined roles or classes of users] to validate the need for such privileges; and

(b) Reassign or remove privileges, if necessary, to correctly reflect organizational mission and business needs.

In practice: Reviewers go through each role's and each person's privileges in a certification campaign, and every keep or remove decision is recorded with the reviewer's name.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Periodic review of the privileges assigned to roles and users is commonly run as certification campaigns with recorded reviewer decisions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Certification campaign export with per-reviewer decisions
AC-6(9) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Log Use of Privileged Functions

Log the execution of privileged functions.

In practice: Each time someone activates a privileged role or runs an admin action, the event is logged with the person, the time and the action for later review.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
Why this classification

Capture of privileged function use is delivered by the privileged access tooling that identity teams run. Alerting, retention and review sit with security operations and are supporting rows in this series.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Use of privileged functions is commonly captured in privileged role activation and administrative audit logs.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Privileged activity log sample with activation records
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
AC-7 AC: Access Control

Unsuccessful Logon Attempts

a. Enforce a limit of [Assignment: organization-defined number] consecutive invalid logon attempts by a user during a [Assignment: organization-defined time period]; and

b. Automatically [Selection (one or more): lock the account or node for [Assignment: organization-defined time period]; lock the account or node until released by an administrator; delay next logon prompt per [Assignment: organization-defined delay algorithm]; notify system administrator; take other [Assignment: organization-defined action]] when the maximum number of unsuccessful attempts is exceeded.

In practice: After a set number of wrong passwords, the account locks or slows down, with the limit and timing chosen by the organization and applied in the directory and sign-in service.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement

Unsuccessful logon limits are commonly set as lockout and throttling policy on the directory and identity provider.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Lockout policy configuration export
  • Identity provider authentication and lockout settings export
AC-17 AC: Access Control

Remote Access

a. Establish and document usage restrictions, configuration/connection requirements, and implementation guidance for each type of remote access allowed; and

b. Authorize each type of remote access to the system prior to allowing such connections.

In practice: Remote workers sign in through the identity service with MFA and access rules that check device and location, under a documented remote access policy.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Remote access is commonly governed by policy-based access rules, multi-factor authentication and session controls at the identity provider.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Remote access policy export and authentication method requirements
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
  • Authentication method and multi-factor policy export
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
IA-2 IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)

Uniquely identify and authenticate organizational users and associate that unique identification with processes acting on behalf of those users.

In practice: Every employee and contractor signs in with their own account through one enterprise identity service, accounts are matched to real people, and MFA is required.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Implement
  • Assess

Unique identification and authentication of organizational users is commonly implemented through a single enterprise identity provider, correlation of accounts to people and multi-factor authentication.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity provider configuration and authentication method policy
  • Authentication method and multi-factor policy export
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
IA-2(1) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Multi-factor Authentication to Privileged Accounts

Implement multi-factor authentication for access to privileged accounts.

In practice: Administrators must use MFA every time they sign in or activate a privileged role, enforced by policy on those roles rather than left to individual choice.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Multi-factor authentication for privileged accounts is commonly enforced by policy on administrative roles and role activation.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Policy export covering administrative roles with exclusions explained
  • Authentication method and multi-factor policy export
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
IA-2(2) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Multi-factor Authentication to Non-privileged Accounts

Implement multi-factor authentication for access to non-privileged accounts.

In practice: Regular users also go through MFA at sign-in, and a registration report shows who has set up a second factor and who still needs to.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Implement

Multi-factor authentication for non-privileged accounts is commonly enforced by policy for all users, with registration reporting.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • MFA registration and enforcement coverage report
  • Authentication method and multi-factor policy export
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
IA-2(5) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Individual Authentication with Group Authentication

When shared accounts or authenticators are employed, require users to be individually authenticated before granting access to the shared accounts or resources.

In practice: When a shared account is allowed, the person first signs in as themselves, then checks the credential out from a vault, so each use traces to one individual.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Individual authentication before group account use is commonly implemented by credential check-out and session attribution to the requesting person.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Check-out records linking group account use to individuals
  • Account-to-identity correlation report with unowned accounts
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
IA-2(6) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Access to Accounts —separate Device

Implement multi-factor authentication for [Selection (one or more): local; network; remote] access to [Selection (one or more): privileged accounts; non-privileged accounts] such that:

(a) One of the factors is provided by a device separate from the system gaining access; and

(b) The device meets [Assignment: organization-defined strength of mechanism requirements].

In practice: The second factor lives on a separate device, such as a phone authenticator app, a hardware security key or a passkey stored on that device.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement

Authentication with a factor on a separate device is commonly implemented with authenticator apps on a phone, hardware security keys, or passkeys held on a device other than the one gaining access.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Authentication method and multi-factor policy export
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
IA-2(8) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Access to Accounts — Replay Resistant

Implement replay-resistant authentication mechanisms for access to [Selection (one or more): privileged accounts; non-privileged accounts].

In practice: Phishing-resistant methods such as security keys or certificates are used; they are designed so a captured sign-in does not work when replayed by someone else.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Implement

Replay-resistant authentication is commonly provided by phishing-resistant methods such as FIDO2 security keys and certificate-based authentication.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Authentication method policy listing permitted methods
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
  • Authentication method and multi-factor policy export
IA-2(10) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Single Sign-on

Provide a single sign-on capability for [Assignment: organization-defined system accounts and services].

In practice: Users sign in once and open their business apps without more prompts, because the apps trust the enterprise identity service through standard federation.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement

Single sign-on is commonly implemented with SAML and OIDC federation to the enterprise identity provider.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Application federation inventory
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-4 IA: Identification and Authentication

Identifier Management

Manage system identifiers by:

a. Receiving authorization from [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] to assign an individual, group, role, service, or device identifier;

b. Selecting an identifier that identifies an individual, group, role, service, or device;

c. Assigning the identifier to the intended individual, group, role, service, or device; and

d. Preventing reuse of identifiers for [Assignment: organization-defined time period].

In practice: Managers or HR authorize new accounts, each person gets one unique identifier at hire under a written naming standard, and old identifiers are not reused for the period the organization sets.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Identifier management is commonly implemented as an authoritative identifier standard, issuance at hire and prevention of reuse across lifecycle events.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identifier naming and reuse standard
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
  • Account-to-identity correlation report with unowned accounts
IA-4(4) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identifier Management | Identify User Status

Manage individual identifiers by uniquely identifying each individual as [Assignment: organization-defined characteristic identifying individual status].

In practice: Each identifier shows whether the person is an employee, contractor or intern, using worker-type and employment-status fields from the HR record.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Identifying user status is commonly implemented with worker-type and employment-status attributes that drive identifier conventions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
  • Identifier naming and reuse standard
IA-5 IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management

Manage system authenticators by:

a. Verifying, as part of the initial authenticator distribution, the identity of the individual, group, role, service, or device receiving the authenticator;

b. Establishing initial authenticator content for any authenticators issued by the organization;

c. Ensuring that authenticators have sufficient strength of mechanism for their intended use;

d. Establishing and implementing administrative procedures for initial authenticator distribution, for lost or compromised or damaged authenticators, and for revoking authenticators;

e. Changing default authenticators prior to first use;

f. Changing or refreshing authenticators [Assignment: organization-defined time period by authenticator type] or when [Assignment: organization-defined events] occur;

g. Protecting authenticator content from unauthorized disclosure and modification;

h. Requiring individuals to take, and having devices implement, specific controls to protect authenticators; and

i. Changing authenticators for group or role accounts when membership to those accounts changes.

In practice: People register authenticators such as an authenticator app or key through a defined process, shared secrets sit in a vault, and credentials are rotated on a schedule.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Implement
  • Assess

Authenticator management is commonly implemented through authenticator registration and lifecycle policy, credential vaulting for shared secrets and rotation.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Authenticator method policy and registration report
  • Authentication method and multi-factor policy export
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
IA-5(1) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Password-based Authentication

For password-based authentication:

(a) Maintain a list of commonly-used, expected, or compromised passwords and update the list [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and when organizational passwords are suspected to have been compromised directly or indirectly;

(b) Verify, when users create or update passwords, that the passwords are not found on the list of commonly-used, expected, or compromised passwords in IA-5(1)(a);

(c) Transmit passwords only over cryptographically-protected channels;

(d) Store passwords using an approved salted key derivation function, preferably using a keyed hash;

(e) Require immediate selection of a new password upon account recovery;

(f) Allow user selection of long passwords and passphrases, including spaces and all printable characters;

(g) Employ automated tools to assist the user in selecting strong password authenticators; and

(h) Enforce the following composition and complexity rules: [Assignment: organization-defined composition and complexity rules].

In practice: The sign-in service blocks common or leaked passwords and sets minimum length, while service account passwords are kept in a vault and changed regularly.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement

Password-based authentication settings are commonly configured as banned-password lists, length and compromise screening on the identity provider, with vaulted rotation for service credentials.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Password policy export
  • Identity provider authentication and lockout settings export
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
IA-5(2) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Public Key-based Authentication

(a) For public key-based authentication:

(1) Enforce authorized access to the corresponding private key; and

(2) Map the authenticated identity to the account of the individual or group; and

(b) When public key infrastructure (PKI) is used:

(1) Validate certificates by constructing and verifying a certification path to an accepted trust anchor, including checking certificate status information; and

(2) Implement a local cache of revocation data to support path discovery and validation.

In practice: Certificates and managed SSH keys can be used to sign in, with the private key kept restricted and each key mapped to one account owner.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Implement
  • Assess

Public key-based authentication is commonly implemented with certificate-based authentication and managed SSH keys.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Certificate and key inventory with validation settings
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
IA-5(7) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | No Embedded Unencrypted Static Authenticators

Ensure that unencrypted static authenticators are not embedded in applications or other forms of static storage.

In practice: Scripts and applications no longer hold passwords in code or config files; the secrets move to a vault or the application uses a workload identity.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement

Removal of embedded static authenticators is commonly done by moving secrets to a vault or to workload identities.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Entra
Evidence commonly examined
  • Secret scanning results and vault onboarding records
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
  • Service account and workload identity inventory with owners
IA-5(9) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Federated Credential Management

Use the following external organizations to federate credentials: [Assignment: organization-defined external organizations].

In practice: Two organizations set up a trust between their identity services, so a partner's user can sign in with the credential their own employer issued.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement

Federated credential management is commonly implemented through trust relationships between identity providers.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust configuration export
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-8 IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Non-organizational Users)

Uniquely identify and authenticate non-organizational users or processes acting on behalf of non-organizational users.

In practice: Partners and guests sign in through external identity federation or a guest policy, so each outside person is still individually identified.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Identification and authentication of non-organizational users is commonly implemented through external identity federation and guest access policy.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • External user identity provider and guest access settings
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
IA-8(2) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Non-organizational Users) | Acceptance of External Authenticators

(a) Accept only external authenticators that are NIST-compliant; and

(b) Document and maintain a list of accepted external authenticators.

In practice: The organization accepts only outside authenticators that meet NIST guidelines, keeps a written list of them, and limits federation with partner identity services to that list.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Implement

Acceptance of external authenticators is commonly implemented through federation with partner identity providers and policy on accepted assurance.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-10 IA: Identification and Authentication

Adaptive Authentication

Require individuals accessing the system to employ [Assignment: organization-defined supplemental authentication techniques or mechanisms] under specific [Assignment: organization-defined circumstances or situations].

In practice: Sign-in becomes stricter when something looks risky, such as an unfamiliar country, so the user is asked for an extra step on those attempts only.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Adaptive authentication is commonly implemented as risk-based policy that raises authentication requirements on sign-ins that score as high risk.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Risk-based policy export with detection signals
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
  • Identity risk detection configuration and alert records
IA-11 IA: Identification and Authentication

Re-authentication

Require users to re-authenticate when [Assignment: organization-defined circumstances or situations requiring re-authentication].

In practice: Sensitive actions, such as changing bank details or approving a high-value request, prompt the user to sign in again, and a reauthentication interval policy sets how often.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Re-authentication is commonly implemented through a reauthentication interval policy and step-up requirements for sensitive actions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Reauthentication interval and step-up policy export
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
IA-12 IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Proofing

a. Identity proof users that require accounts for logical access to systems based on appropriate identity assurance level requirements as specified in applicable standards and guidelines;

b. Resolve user identities to a unique individual; and

c. Collect, validate, and verify identity evidence.

In practice: New hires have their identity checked during onboarding, including remote checks with verifiable credentials, before an account with real access is issued.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Identity proofing is commonly implemented as a verification step in onboarding, including remote verification with verifiable credentials.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity proofing procedure and onboarding verification records
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
IA-13 IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Providers and Authorization Servers

Employ identity providers and authorization servers to manage user, device, and non-person entity (NPE) identities, attributes, and access rights supporting authentication and authorization decisions in accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined identification and authentication policy] using [Assignment: organization-defined mechanisms].

In practice: The organization runs its identity service and authorization server as the trusted source of sign-in, with managed signing keys, set token lifetimes and verified assertions.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement

Identity providers and authorization servers are commonly operated with managed signing keys, defined token lifetimes and verified assertions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity provider and authorization server configuration export
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-13(2) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Providers and Authorization Servers | Verification of Identity Assertions and Access Tokens

The source and integrity of identity assertions and access tokens are verified before granting access to system and information resources.

In practice: Each application checks that a token's signature is valid, that it was meant for that app and that it has not expired, before letting the person in.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement

Verification of identity assertions and access tokens is commonly implemented through signature validation, audience and lifetime checks on relying parties.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-13(3) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Providers and Authorization Servers | Token Management

In accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined identification and authentication policy], assertions and access tokens are:

(a) generated;

(b) issued;

(c) refreshed;

(d) revoked;

(e) time-restricted; and

(f) audience-restricted.

In practice: Tokens have set lifetimes, can be revoked when a user leaves, and may be tied to a device or session, which limits what a stolen one can do.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Primary
  • Implement
  • Manage

Token management is commonly implemented through token lifetime, revocation and protection or session-binding settings.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
PS-4 PS: Personnel Security

Personnel Termination

Upon termination of individual employment:

a. Disable system access within [Assignment: organization-defined time period];

b. Terminate or revoke any authenticators and credentials associated with the individual;

c. Conduct exit interviews that include a discussion of [Assignment: organization-defined information security topics];

d. Retrieve all security-related organizational system-related property; and

e. Retain access to organizational information and systems formerly controlled by terminated individual.

In practice: On the termination date, an HR event disables the person's accounts, removes their access and prompts return of credentials, all within the time the organization has set.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Personnel termination is commonly implemented through lifecycle workflows that disable accounts, revoke access and retrieve credentials at the termination event.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Termination event records with time to account disablement
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
PS-4(2) PS: Personnel Security

Personnel Termination | Automated Actions

Use [Assignment: organization-defined automated mechanisms] to [Selection (one or more): notify [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] of individual termination actions; disable access to system resources].

In practice: A termination in the HR system automatically starts a workflow that notifies the manager and security team and disables the accounts, with no manual ticket needed.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Automated actions on termination are commonly implemented as lifecycle workflows that notify and act on the termination event.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
PS-5 PS: Personnel Security

Personnel Transfer

a. Review and confirm ongoing operational need for current logical and physical access authorizations to systems and facilities when individuals are reassigned or transferred to other positions within the organization;

b. Initiate [Assignment: organization-defined transfer or reassignment actions] within [Assignment: organization-defined time period following the formal transfer action];

c. Modify access authorization as needed to correspond with any changes in operational need due to reassignment or transfer; and

d. Notify [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] within [Assignment: organization-defined time period].

In practice: When someone moves to a new department, a mover workflow asks the manager to confirm which old access is still needed and removes the rest.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Primary
  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Personnel transfer is commonly implemented through mover workflows that reassess access and trigger review when role or department changes.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Mover event records with access change or review outcome
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
  • Certification campaign export with per-reviewer decisions
AC-1 AC: Access Control

Policy and Procedures

a. Develop, document, and disseminate to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles]:

1. [Selection (one or more): organization-level; mission/business process-level; system-level] access control policy that:

(a) Addresses purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, coordination among organizational entities, and compliance; and

(b) Is consistent with applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and

2. Procedures to facilitate the implementation of the access control policy and the associated access controls;

b. Designate an [Assignment: organization-defined official] to manage the development, documentation, and dissemination of the access control policy and procedures; and

c. Review and update the current access control:

1. Policy [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events]; and

2. Procedures [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events].

In practice: The security team writes the access control policy; identity work supplies the inputs, such as account types, who signs off on requests, how often access is reviewed and how exceptions are logged.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Policy and procedure documentation is usually owned by the security governance function; identity work supplies the inputs.

  • Assess

Identity assessment commonly produces the inputs to access control policy: account types, approval roles, review cadence and exceptions.

Not mapped
Evidence commonly examined
  • Access control policy with approval date, owner and review date
  • Identity assessment report with findings and remediation plan
AC-2(5) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Inactivity Logout

Require that users log out when [Assignment: organization-defined time period of expected inactivity or description of when to log out].

In practice: Policy tells users to sign out when they expect to be away longer than a set time, and session limits at the sign-in service are kept consistent with that rule.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

NIST describes this enhancement as behavior- or policy-based; identity session settings only support it.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Inactivity logout is a user rule set in policy and rules of behavior; NIST addresses automatic enforcement under AC-11. Identity work contributes by keeping identity provider session limits consistent with the logout rule the organization sets.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Rules of behavior or acceptable use policy stating the logout requirement
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
AC-2(6) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Dynamic Privilege Management

Implement [Assignment: organization-defined dynamic privilege management capabilities].

In practice: Rather than leaving broad rights in place all the time, staff request elevated access for a task and it expires afterward; the security team defines when that applies.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Requires system-level support for dynamic privilege changes; identity tooling contributes the elevation and policy layer.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Dynamic privilege management is commonly approximated with just-in-time elevation and context-based policy rather than standing privileges.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
AC-2(8) AC: Access Control

Account Management | Dynamic Account Management

Create, activate, manage, and deactivate [Assignment: organization-defined system accounts] dynamically.

In practice: Accounts for short-lived systems or automated workloads are created when the workload starts and removed when it ends, using the same lifecycle rules as people.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Applies mainly to cloud and workload platforms that create accounts on demand.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Dynamic account management commonly relies on automated creation and deactivation of accounts for ephemeral or workload identities.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Service account and workload identity inventory with owners
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
AC-3(2) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Dual Authorization

Enforce dual authorization for [Assignment: organization-defined privileged commands and/or other organization-defined actions].

In practice: For the riskiest actions, a second person must sign off before the elevation or vault check-out goes through, and both names are recorded.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

The control targets specified system actions; identity tooling supplies approval workflow for privileged access.

  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Assess

Dual authorization is commonly implemented as an approval step on privileged elevation or credential check-out.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Approval workflow configuration for privileged activation
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
AC-3(10) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Audited Override of Access Control Mechanisms

Employ an audited override of automated access control mechanisms under [Assignment: organization-defined conditions] by [Assignment: organization-defined roles].

In practice: A break-glass account exists for emergencies; every use is alerted on and reviewed afterward by someone other than the person who used it.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

The override mechanism itself is system-specific.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Audited override is commonly implemented as emergency access accounts with monitored use and review after each activation.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Emergency access account usage log and post-use review record
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
AC-4(17) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Domain Authentication

Uniquely identify and authenticate source and destination points by [Selection (one or more): organization, system, application, service, individual] for information transfer.

In practice: When two systems exchange data, each uses its own service identity and certificate so both ends are known; the network and application teams own the flow itself.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement is usually a network and data architecture concern. Identity commonly contributes the workload identities and certificate or token based service authentication on which the transfer mechanism relies to identify its endpoints.

  • Assess
  • Implement

Workload identities and certificate or token based service authentication can support domain authentication of transfer endpoints.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Service account and workload identity inventory with owners
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
AC-6(3) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Network Access to Privileged Commands

Authorize network access to [Assignment: organization-defined privileged commands] only for [Assignment: organization-defined compelling operational needs] and document the rationale for such access in the security plan for the system.

In practice: Remote use of powerful commands goes through a brokered session that records who connected and requires a written business reason first.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Supporting
Why this classification

Network path restrictions are usually owned by network and platform engineering.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Network access to privileged commands is commonly brokered through privileged session management with documented rationale.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Privileged session broker configuration and a recorded session sample
  • Security plan entry documenting the rationale for remote privileged access
AC-6(8) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Privilege Levels for Code Execution

Prevent the following software from executing at higher privilege levels than users executing the software: [Assignment: organization-defined software].

In practice: The endpoint team decides which software may run with elevated rights; identity roles help by limiting who can request that elevation in the first place.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Primary ownership usually sits with endpoint and platform engineering.

  • Implement

Privilege levels for code execution are commonly constrained through endpoint privilege management policy.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Endpoint privilege policy and elevation log sample
AC-6(10) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Prohibit Non-privileged Users from Executing Privileged Functions

Prevent non-privileged users from executing privileged functions.

In practice: The endpoint team sets elevation rules that stop regular users from running admin functions; identity contributes role design that keeps admin rights out of ordinary roles.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Technical prevention is usually enforced by the platform; identity work scopes who holds privilege.

  • Implement
  • Assess
  • Manage
  • Role Mining Engine

Prevention of privileged function execution by non-privileged users commonly depends on role design and endpoint elevation policy.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Endpoint privilege policy and elevation log sample
  • Role and entitlement catalogue with owners
AC-7(4) AC: Access Control

Unsuccessful Logon Attempts | Use of Alternate Authentication Factor

(a) Allow the use of [Assignment: organization-defined authentication factors] that are different from the primary authentication factors after the number of organization-defined consecutive invalid logon attempts have been exceeded; and

(b) Enforce a limit of [Assignment: organization-defined number] consecutive invalid logon attempts through use of the alternative factors by a user during a [Assignment: organization-defined time period].

In practice: After repeated failed attempts, a user may show who they are another way, such as a security key; the allowed methods are set in the authentication policy.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Behavior depends on the authenticator platform.

  • Implement

Use of an alternate authentication factor after failed attempts commonly falls under authentication method policy.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Authentication method and multi-factor policy export
AC-9(3) AC: Access Control

Previous Logon Notification | Notification of Account Changes

Notify the user, upon successful logon, of changes to [Assignment: organization-defined security-related characteristics or parameters of the user’s account] during [Assignment: organization-defined time period].

In practice: When a user's password or sign-in method changes, the identity service sends them an alert, so they can spot a change they did not make.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Notification delivery is usually platform specific.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Identity work contributes user notifications of changes to sign-in methods and passwords; presenting those changes at the next logon, as the control states, depends on the platform.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • End-user security notification settings for password and sign-in method changes
AC-10 AC: Access Control

Concurrent Session Control

Limit the number of concurrent sessions for each [Assignment: organization-defined account and/or account type] to [Assignment: organization-defined number].

In practice: The security team sets how many sessions one account can hold at once; where the sign-in service supports it, extra sessions are limited or ended.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Supporting
Why this classification

Often enforced in the application rather than the identity layer.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Concurrent session limits are commonly addressed through session controls at the identity provider where supported.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
AC-12 AC: Access Control

Session Termination

Automatically terminate a user session after [Assignment: organization-defined conditions or trigger events requiring session disconnect].

In practice: Sessions end after conditions the organization sets, such as a maximum length or a revoked sign-in, using session lifetime and token revocation settings.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Application and platform session handling is usually the primary implementation point.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Session termination conditions are commonly set through session lifetime, reauthentication interval and token revocation policy.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
AC-12(1) AC: Access Control

Session Termination | User-initiated Logouts

Provide a logout capability for user-initiated communications sessions whenever authentication is used to gain access to [Assignment: organization-defined information resources].

In practice: Users have a clear sign out option, and where single sign-on is used, signing out can end the session across connected applications.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Application feature; identity provider contributes single logout.

  • Implement
  • Manage

User-initiated logout is commonly supported through single logout and session revocation features.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Single logout configuration for federated applications, with a sample sign-out trace
AC-14 AC: Access Control

Permitted Actions Without Identification or Authentication

a. Identify [Assignment: organization-defined user actions] that can be performed on the system without identification or authentication consistent with organizational mission and business functions; and

b. Document and provide supporting rationale in the security plan for the system, user actions not requiring identification or authentication.

In practice: The application owner lists the few actions anyone may take without signing in, like viewing a public page, and that list is reviewed with the access policy.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Defining the permitted actions is usually a system owner decision.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Actions permitted without identification are commonly documented as an exception list reviewed alongside access policy.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Security plan section listing actions permitted without identification or authentication, with rationale
AC-16 AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes

a. Provide the means to associate [Assignment: organization-defined types of security and privacy attributes] with [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy attribute values] for information in storage, in process, and/or in transmission;

b. Ensure that the attribute associations are made and retained with the information;

c. Establish the following permitted security and privacy attributes from the attributes defined in AC-16a for [Assignment: organization-defined systems]: [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy attributes];

d. Determine the following permitted attribute values or ranges for each of the established attributes: [Assignment: organization-defined attribute values or ranges for established attributes];

e. Audit changes to attributes; and

f. Review [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy attributes] for applicability [Assignment: organization-defined frequency].

In practice: Data owners define labels such as sensitivity or department, and identity attributes are managed under a standard with a named owner for each attribute.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Binding attributes to information objects is usually a data platform concern.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Security and privacy attributes associated with identities and resources are commonly governed through attribute standards and ownership.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity attribute standard with an owner per attribute
AC-16(2) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Attribute Value Changes by Authorized Individuals

Provide authorized individuals (or processes acting on behalf of individuals) the capability to define or change the value of associated security and privacy attributes.

In practice: Only people in defined roles can change the value of a security attribute on a user or resource, and each change is logged and reviewed.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Object-level attribute handling is usually platform specific.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Attribute value changes by authorized individuals are commonly limited to defined roles, with changes logged and reviewed.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity attribute standard with an owner per attribute
  • Change log for attribute values
AC-16(10) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Attribute Configuration by Authorized Individuals

Provide authorized individuals the capability to define or change the type and value of security and privacy attributes available for association with subjects and objects.

In practice: Only named administrators can add or change the types of security attributes that exist, and that small group is part of regular access reviews.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Object-level attribute handling is usually platform specific.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Attribute configuration by authorized individuals is commonly limited to named administrative roles.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity attribute standard with an owner per attribute
  • List of administrators who can define attribute types
AC-17(1) AC: Access Control

Remote Access | Monitoring and Control

Employ automated mechanisms to monitor and control remote access methods.

In practice: Remote sign-ins are logged and checked against policy; identity tooling provides the sign-in records that the network team's monitoring uses.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Network monitoring tooling carries primary ownership.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Monitoring and control of remote access commonly includes sign-in logging and policy enforcement points that identity tooling feeds.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
AC-17(4) AC: Access Control

Remote Access | Privileged Commands and Access

(a) Authorize the execution of privileged commands and access to security-relevant information via remote access only in a format that provides assessable evidence and for the following needs: [Assignment: organization-defined needs]; and

(b) Document the rationale for remote access in the security plan for the system.

In practice: Admin commands from outside the office run through a brokered session, so the activity is authorized and recorded before it reaches the system.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Primary enforcement is usually on the remote access gateway or target.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Privileged commands over remote access are commonly authorized through brokered privileged sessions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Privileged role assignment and activation settings export
  • Privileged session broker configuration and a recorded session sample
  • Security plan entry documenting the rationale for remote privileged access
AC-17(9) AC: Access Control

Remote Access | Disconnect or Disable Access

Provide the capability to disconnect or disable remote access to the system within [Assignment: organization-defined time period].

In practice: When a remote worker leaves or a device is lost, the help desk revokes their sessions and disables the account within the time the organization has set.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Connection teardown is usually performed by the access gateway.

  • Implement
  • Manage
  • Assess

Disconnecting or disabling remote access is commonly supported by session revocation and account disablement.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
Evidence commonly examined
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
AC-17(10) AC: Access Control

Remote Access | Authenticate Remote Commands

Implement [Assignment: organization-defined mechanisms] to authenticate [Assignment: organization-defined remote commands].

In practice: Remote commands carry a signed request from a known workload identity, so the receiving system can check who sent it; the platform team owns the setup.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Mechanism is usually specific to management protocols.

  • Assess
  • Implement

Authentication of remote commands commonly relies on signed requests and workload identities.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Service account and workload identity inventory with owners
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
AC-18 AC: Access Control

Wireless Access

a. Establish configuration requirements, connection requirements, and implementation guidance for each type of wireless access; and

b. Authorize each type of wireless access to the system prior to allowing such connections.

In practice: The network team sets wireless rules and authorizes each type of access; identity work supplies the directory-backed or certificate-based sign-in that users and devices use.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Wireless configuration is usually owned by network engineering.

  • Implement

Wireless access authorization is commonly tied to directory-backed or certificate-based device and user authentication.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Device registration and device-state policy export
AC-18(1) AC: Access Control

Wireless Access | Authentication and Encryption

Protect wireless access to the system using authentication of [Selection (one or more): users; devices] and encryption.

In practice: Laptops and phones join the wireless network with a certificate or directory login, and traffic is encrypted; identity supplies the credentials, and the network team runs the radios.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Wireless configuration is usually owned by network engineering.

  • Implement

Authentication for wireless access is commonly implemented with certificate-based or directory-backed 802.1X authentication.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Device registration and device-state policy export
AC-19 AC: Access Control

Access Control for Mobile Devices

a. Establish configuration requirements, connection requirements, and implementation guidance for organization-controlled mobile devices, to include when such devices are outside of controlled areas; and

b. Authorize the connection of mobile devices to organizational systems.

In practice: Phones and tablets must be registered and meet device rules before they can reach company apps; the endpoint team sets the rules, and sign-in policy checks them.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Device configuration is usually owned by endpoint management.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Mobile device access is commonly gated by device registration, compliance state and policy-based access rules.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Device registration and device-state policy export
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
AC-20 AC: Access Control

Use of External Systems

a. [Selection (one or more): establish [Assignment: organization-defined terms and conditions]; identify [Assignment: organization-defined controls asserted to be implemented on external systems]], consistent with the trust relationships established with other organizations owning, operating, and/or maintaining external systems, allowing authorized individuals to:

1. Access the system from external systems; and

2. Process, store, or transmit organization-controlled information using external systems; or

b. Prohibit the use of [Assignment: organizationally-defined types of external systems].

In practice: Policy decides what people may do from partner networks or personal devices, and identity settings control guest users and unmanaged device access to company apps.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Agreements and technical limits on external systems extend beyond identity.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Use of external systems is commonly governed through external identity, cross-organization and unmanaged-device access policy.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
  • Device registration and device-state policy export
AC-20(3) AC: Access Control

Use of External Systems | Non-organizationally Owned Systems — Restricted Use

Restrict the use of non-organizationally owned systems or system components to process, store, or transmit organizational information using [Assignment: organization-defined restrictions].

In practice: From a personal or unmanaged laptop, a user gets limited access, such as browser-only with downloads blocked, based on device-state conditions at sign-in.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Device management is usually owned by endpoint engineering.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Restrictions on non-organizationally owned systems are commonly expressed as device-state conditions and session limits.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Device registration and device-state policy export
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
AC-24 AC: Access Control

Access Control Decisions

[Selection (one or more): establish procedures; implement mechanisms] to ensure [Assignment: organization-defined access control decisions] are applied to each access request prior to access enforcement.

In practice: A central policy decision point in the identity service checks each request's attributes before access is granted; the application owner defines what must be checked.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Decision logic spans application and platform design.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Access control decisions are commonly made at a policy decision point that identity tooling operates, using the attributes of the request.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Policy-based access rule export with condition and grant settings
AC-24(1) AC: Access Control

Access Control Decisions | Transmit Access Authorization Information

Transmit [Assignment: organization-defined access authorization information] using [Assignment: organization-defined controls] to [Assignment: organization-defined systems] that enforce access control decisions.

In practice: After sign-in, the identity service passes signed tokens with the user's roles to the application, which relies on them to decide what the person may open.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Token consumption is usually application specific.

  • Implement

Transmission of access authorization information is commonly performed through signed tokens and claims between identity provider and relying party.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
AU-2 AU: Audit and Accountability

Event Logging

a. Identify the types of events that the system is capable of logging in support of the audit function: [Assignment: organization-defined event types that the system is capable of logging];

b. Coordinate the event logging function with other organizational entities requiring audit-related information to guide and inform the selection criteria for events to be logged;

c. Specify the following event types for logging within the system: [Assignment: organization-defined event types (subset of the event types defined in AU-2a.) along with the frequency of (or situation requiring) logging for each identified event type];

d. Provide a rationale for why the event types selected for logging are deemed to be adequate to support after-the-fact investigations of incidents; and

e. Review and update the event types selected for logging [Assignment: organization-defined frequency].

In practice: The security team chooses which events to log; identity contributes sign-ins, authentication method changes, role changes and privileged activations to that list.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Audit event selection is usually owned by security monitoring.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Event selection commonly includes identity events: sign-ins, authentication method changes, role changes and privileged activations.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
AU-3 AU: Audit and Accountability

Content of Audit Records

Ensure that audit records contain information that establishes the following:

a. What type of event occurred;

b. When the event occurred;

c. Where the event occurred;

d. Source of the event;

e. Outcome of the event; and

f. Identity of any individuals, subjects, or objects/entities associated with the event.

In practice: Each identity log entry shows who did what, when, from where and whether it worked, which helps the security team follow an event.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Record content is determined by each log source.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Identity log records commonly carry the user, source, outcome and application of each event.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
AU-6 AU: Audit and Accountability

Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting

a. Review and analyze system audit records [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] for indications of [Assignment: organization-defined inappropriate or unusual activity] and the potential impact of the inappropriate or unusual activity;

b. Report findings to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles]; and

c. Adjust the level of audit record review, analysis, and reporting within the system when there is a change in risk based on law enforcement information, intelligence information, or other credible sources of information.

In practice: The security team reviews logs on a schedule; identity risk detections and SIEM content for sign-ins and privileged activity point reviewers to what to look at.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Review and reporting processes are usually owned by security operations.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Review of identity logs is commonly supported by identity risk detections and SIEM content for authentication and privileged activity.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
  • Identity risk detection configuration and alert records
AU-9 AU: Audit and Accountability

Protection of Audit Information

a. Protect audit information and audit logging tools from unauthorized access, modification, and deletion; and

b. Alert [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] upon detection of unauthorized access, modification, or deletion of audit information.

In practice: Only a small group can read or manage identity logs, and administrators who run the identity system are kept separate from those who guard its logs.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Primary ownership usually sits with logging platform administration.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Protection of audit information commonly includes role-based access to identity log stores and administrator separation.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
AU-12 AU: Audit and Accountability

Audit Record Generation

a. Provide audit record generation capability for the event types the system is capable of auditing as defined in AU-2a on [Assignment: organization-defined system components];

b. Allow [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] to select the event types that are to be logged by specific components of the system; and

c. Generate audit records for the event types defined in AU-2c that include the audit record content defined in AU-3.

In practice: The identity service, governance platform and privileged access vault each have logging turned on, and their records are routed to the central SIEM.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Generation capability is usually a feature of each system.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Audit record generation commonly depends on enabling identity provider, governance and privileged access logging and routing it to the SIEM.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity log source inventory with retention settings
AU-14 AU: Audit and Accountability

Session Audit

a. Provide and implement the capability for [Assignment: organization-defined users or roles] to [Selection (one or more): record; view; hear; log] the content of a user session under [Assignment: organization-defined circumstances]; and

b. Develop, integrate, and use session auditing activities in consultation with legal counsel and in accordance with applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines.

In practice: When someone uses a privileged account, the session can be recorded so an authorized reviewer can replay what was done later.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Application and platform session capture is usually the primary implementation point.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Session audit is commonly supported by recorded privileged sessions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Privileged session recording configuration and sample recording index
IA-1 IA: Identification and Authentication

Policy and Procedures

a. Develop, document, and disseminate to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles]:

1. [Selection (one or more): organization-level; mission/business process-level; system-level] identification and authentication policy that:

(a) Addresses purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, coordination among organizational entities, and compliance; and

(b) Is consistent with applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and

2. Procedures to facilitate the implementation of the identification and authentication policy and the associated identification and authentication controls;

b. Designate an [Assignment: organization-defined official] to manage the development, documentation, and dissemination of the identification and authentication policy and procedures; and

c. Review and update the current identification and authentication:

1. Policy [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events]; and

2. Procedures [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events].

In practice: The security team writes the sign-in policy; identity assessment supplies the inputs, such as which authenticators are in use, what assurance level each app needs and what exceptions exist.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Policy documentation is usually owned by the security governance function.

  • Assess

Identity assessment commonly supplies the identification and authentication policy inputs: authenticator types, assurance levels and exceptions.

Not mapped
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identification and authentication policy with approval date and owner
  • Identity assessment report with findings and remediation plan
IA-2(12) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Acceptance of PIV Credentials

Accept and electronically verify Personal Identity Verification-compliant credentials.

In practice: Where federal-style smart cards are in use, the sign-in service is set up to read and check the card's certificate; the badge office issues the cards.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Applies to federal PIV deployments.

  • Implement

Acceptance of PIV credentials is commonly implemented through certificate-based authentication configuration.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
IA-2(13) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Out-of-band Authentication

Implement the following out-of-band authentication mechanisms under [Assignment: organization-defined conditions]: [Assignment: organization-defined out-of-band authentication].

In practice: A user may confirm a sign-in through a phone notification or call to a registered number, under conditions the organization chooses.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Mechanism choice is usually a system owner decision.

  • Implement

Out-of-band authentication is commonly provided by push or voice methods registered to the user.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Authentication method and multi-factor policy export
IA-3 IA: Identification and Authentication

Device Identification and Authentication

Uniquely identify and authenticate [Assignment: organization-defined devices and/or types of devices] before establishing a [Selection (one or more): local; remote; network] connection.

In practice: Company laptops and devices are registered and carry a certificate, so the network can tell a known device from an unknown one; the endpoint team owns the devices.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Network-layer device authentication is usually owned by network engineering.

  • Implement

Device identification and authentication is commonly implemented with device registration and certificate-based device identity.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Device registration and device-state policy export
IA-3(1) IA: Identification and Authentication

Device Identification and Authentication | Cryptographic Bidirectional Authentication

Authenticate [Assignment: organization-defined devices and/or types of devices] before establishing [Selection (one or more): local; remote; network] connection using bidirectional authentication that is cryptographically based.

In practice: A device and the server it connects to each present a certificate and check the other's, so neither side talks to an impostor; identity supports the certificate setup.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Protocol implementation is usually owned by network engineering.

  • Implement

Cryptographic bidirectional authentication of devices is commonly implemented with device certificates.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Device registration and device-state policy export
IA-3(4) IA: Identification and Authentication

Device Identification and Authentication | Device Attestation

Handle device identification and authentication based on attestation by [Assignment: organization-defined configuration management process].

In practice: At sign-in, the identity service checks whether the device's health report comes from the organization's configuration process, and blocks devices that fail.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Attestation mechanisms are device platform features.

  • Implement

Device attestation is commonly used in device-state conditions evaluated at sign-in.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Device registration and device-state policy export
IA-4(1) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identifier Management | Prohibit Account Identifiers as Public Identifiers

Prohibit the use of system account identifiers that are the same as public identifiers for individual accounts.

In practice: A person's login name is kept different from their public email or published name, which is handled in identifier and directory design.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Public identifier policy is usually owned by the messaging and communications teams.

  • Assess
  • Implement

Separating account identifiers from public identifiers is commonly addressed in identifier and directory design.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identifier naming and reuse standard
  • Directory report comparing account identifiers with public identifiers such as email addresses
IA-4(5) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identifier Management | Dynamic Management

Manage individual identifiers dynamically in accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined dynamic identifier policy].

In practice: Identifiers for short-lived systems or workloads are issued and retired automatically under a dynamic identifier policy the organization sets.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Applies mainly to cloud and workload platforms.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Dynamic identifier management is commonly relevant to ephemeral and workload identities.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Service account and workload identity inventory with owners
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
IA-4(6) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identifier Management | Cross-organization Management

Coordinate with the following external organizations for cross-organization management of identifiers: [Assignment: organization-defined external organizations].

In practice: When partners need access, the two organizations agree how each other's people are identified, usually set up in federation or external identity configuration.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Requires agreement with the other organization.

  • Implement

Cross-organization identifier management is commonly addressed in federation and external identity configuration.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-4(8) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identifier Management | Pairwise Pseudonymous Identifiers

Generate pairwise pseudonymous identifiers.

In practice: Some applications see a unique, meaningless identifier for each user instead of a shared one, a pairwise option offered by modern sign-in standards.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Privacy design decision for the relying party.

  • Implement

Pairwise pseudonymous identifiers are commonly supported as an OIDC subject identifier option.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-4(9) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identifier Management | Attribute Maintenance and Protection

Maintain the attributes for each uniquely identified individual, device, or service in [Assignment: organization-defined protected central storage].

In practice: Each person's attributes, such as title and manager, are kept in one protected authoritative source, with named owners and a change process.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Attribute policy is usually shared with HR and privacy functions.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Attribute maintenance and protection are commonly addressed through authoritative-source attribute ownership and change control.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Account-to-identity correlation report with unowned accounts
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
IA-5(5) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Change Authenticators Prior to Delivery

Require developers and installers of system components to provide unique authenticators or change default authenticators prior to delivery and installation.

In practice: When a new appliance or platform arrives, the installer changes its default password to a unique one before it goes into service, and the new credential is vaulted.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Procedural control usually owned by delivery and engineering teams.

  • Assess
  • Implement

Changing default authenticators before delivery is commonly addressed in credential onboarding for platforms and appliances.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
IA-5(6) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Protection of Authenticators

Protect authenticators commensurate with the security category of the information to which use of the authenticator permits access.

In practice: Credentials are stored in a vault with limited access, and the more sensitive the system they open, the tighter the controls around them.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Protection levels depend on the system storing the authenticator.

  • Assess
  • Implement

Protection of authenticators is commonly supported by vaulting and by access control on credential stores.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
IA-5(8) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Multiple System Accounts

Implement [Assignment: organization-defined security controls] to manage the risk of compromise due to individuals having accounts on multiple systems.

In practice: People who hold accounts on many systems sign in once through single sign-on or go passwordless, which lowers the number of passwords that can be lost.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Implementation depends on the number of independent systems.

  • Implement

Risk from multiple system accounts is commonly reduced through single sign-on and passwordless methods.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
IA-5(10) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Dynamic Credential Binding

Bind identities and authenticators dynamically using the following rules: [Assignment: organization-defined binding rules].

In practice: Short-lived workload credentials and device-bound credentials are tied to their owner by defined rules when issued, then expire.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Platform specific.

  • Implement
  • Assess

Dynamic credential binding is commonly relevant to short-lived workload credentials and device-bound credentials.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
  • Service account and workload identity inventory with owners
IA-5(13) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Expiration of Cached Authenticators

Prohibit the use of cached authenticators after [Assignment: organization-defined time period].

In practice: Cached credentials stop working after a set time, which token lifetime and session policy settings carry out, limiting how long a stolen cache stays useful.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Token and cache handling is usually application specific.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Expiration of cached authenticators is commonly addressed through token lifetime and session policy.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
IA-5(16) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | In-person or Trusted External Party Authenticator Issuance

Require that the issuance of [Assignment: organization-defined types of and/or specific authenticators] be conducted [Selection: in person; by a trusted external party] before [Assignment: organization-defined registration authority] with authorization by [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles].

In practice: For high-trust credentials like hardware security keys, onboarding includes handing the key over in person or through a trusted third party.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Physical issuance is usually a human resources and security operations process.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

In-person or trusted external party authenticator issuance is commonly a step in onboarding for credentials such as security keys.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
IA-5(18) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Password Managers

(a) Employ [Assignment: organization-defined password managers] to generate and manage passwords; and

(b) Protect the passwords using [Assignment: organization-defined controls].

In practice: Staff use an approved enterprise password manager or vault to create and store passwords, with user guidance on how to use it.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Product selection is usually an organizational decision.

  • Assess
  • Implement

Password managers are commonly addressed through an enterprise credential vault and user guidance.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
IA-6 IA: Identification and Authentication

Authentication Feedback

Obscure feedback of authentication information during the authentication process to protect the information from possible exploitation and use by unauthorized individuals.

In practice: The sign-in page hides what is typed and gives generic error messages, so it does not reveal whether the username or the password was wrong.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Mostly an application behavior.

  • Assess
  • Implement

Authentication feedback is commonly governed by sign-in page and error message settings on the identity provider.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity provider authentication and lockout settings export
IA-8(1) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Non-organizational Users) | Acceptance of PIV Credentials from Other Agencies

Accept and electronically verify Personal Identity Verification-compliant credentials from other federal agencies.

In practice: Where agencies share smart cards, the sign-in service trusts their certificates through a configured certificate trust; the card issuer handles the cards.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Applies to federal deployments.

  • Implement

Acceptance of PIV credentials from other agencies is commonly implemented through certificate trust configuration.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-8(4) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Non-organizational Users) | Use of Defined Profiles

Conform to the following profiles for identity management [Assignment: organization-defined identity management profiles].

In practice: Federation with outside parties follows a defined profile, so the claims and formats exchanged are the same for each partner.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Profiles are defined by the sponsoring program.

  • Implement

Use of defined profiles is commonly implemented through federation profiles and claim requirements.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-8(5) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Non-organizational Users) | Acceptance of PIV-I Credentials

Accept and verify federated or PKI credentials that meet [Assignment: organization-defined policy].

In practice: Certificates issued to affiliated or non-government people are accepted only when they meet the organization's stated policy, using configured certificate trust.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Applies to federal deployments.

  • Implement

Acceptance of PIV-I credentials is commonly implemented through certificate trust configuration.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-9 IA: Identification and Authentication

Service Identification and Authentication

Uniquely identify and authenticate [Assignment: organization-defined system services and applications] before establishing communications with devices, users, or other services or applications.

In practice: Applications and services show who they are to each other with workload identities and certificates or tokens before they exchange data.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Service design and protocol choice are usually owned by engineering.

  • Assess
  • Implement

Service identification and authentication is commonly implemented with workload identities and certificate or token based service authentication.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Service account and workload identity inventory with owners
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
IA-12(1) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Proofing | Supervisor Authorization

Require that the registration process to receive an account for logical access includes supervisor or sponsor authorization.

In practice: A new account request includes a manager or sponsor sign-off step in the onboarding workflow, so someone accountable vouches for the person.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Procedural step usually owned by human resources.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Supervisor authorization for identity proofing is commonly implemented as a manager approval step in onboarding.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
IA-12(2) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Proofing | Identity Evidence

Require evidence of individual identification be presented to the registration authority.

In practice: The onboarding procedure states which identity documents the registration team must see, and the verification tool settings reflect that rule.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Evidence requirements derive from the proofing policy.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Identity evidence requirements are commonly set in onboarding procedures and verified-credential settings.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity proofing procedure and onboarding verification records
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
IA-12(3) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Proofing | Identity Evidence Validation and Verification

Require that the presented identity evidence be validated and verified through [Assignment: organizational defined methods of validation and verification].

In practice: The documents a new hire presents are checked for validity, often through a remote verification service, before the registration team issues the account.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Verification providers and methods are usually a program decision.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Validation and verification of identity evidence is commonly supported by remote verification services.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Identity proofing procedure and onboarding verification records
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
IA-12(6) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Proofing | Accept Externally-proofed Identities

Accept externally-proofed identities at [Assignment: organization-defined identity assurance level].

In practice: If a trusted outside provider has already verified someone's identity, the organization accepts that result at the assurance level it has chosen, through federation.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Requires an agreement and assurance mapping with the provider.

  • Implement
  • Assess
  • Manage

Acceptance of externally proofed identities is commonly implemented through federation with a trusted proofing provider.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
IA-13(1) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Providers and Authorization Servers | Protection of Cryptographic Keys

Cryptographic keys that protect access tokens are generated, managed, and protected from disclosure and misuse.

In practice: The certificates that sign tokens are tracked on a calendar, renewed before expiry and stored in protected key storage, with access limited to a few administrators.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Supporting
Why this classification

Key protection is usually shared with platform and cryptographic key management teams.

  • Implement

Protection of identity provider signing keys is commonly addressed through certificate lifecycle management and key storage controls.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
PS-3 PS: Personnel Security

Personnel Screening

a. Screen individuals prior to authorizing access to the system; and

b. Rescreen individuals in accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined conditions requiring rescreening and, where rescreening is so indicated, the frequency of rescreening].

In practice: HR finishes background screening first, and the onboarding workflow holds back the new hire's access until the screening is recorded as complete.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Screening itself is usually performed by human resources and security.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Personnel screening is commonly implemented as a gate in onboarding that withholds access until screening is recorded complete.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
PS-6 PS: Personnel Security

Access Agreements

a. Develop and document access agreements for organizational systems;

b. Review and update the access agreements [Assignment: organization-defined frequency]; and

c. Verify that individuals requiring access to organizational information and systems:

1. Sign appropriate access agreements prior to being granted access; and

2. Re-sign access agreements to maintain access to organizational systems when access agreements have been updated or [Assignment: organization-defined frequency].

In practice: New hires and contractors acknowledge the rules of use during onboarding or when they request access, and the signed acknowledgment is stored with the request.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Agreement content is usually owned by legal and human resources.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

Access agreements are commonly tracked as an acknowledgement step in onboarding and in access requests.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
PS-7 PS: Personnel Security

External Personnel Security

a. Establish personnel security requirements, including security roles and responsibilities for external providers;

b. Require external providers to comply with personnel security policies and procedures established by the organization;

c. Document personnel security requirements;

d. Require external providers to notify [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] of any personnel transfers or terminations of external personnel who possess organizational credentials and/or badges, or who have system privileges within [Assignment: organization-defined time period]; and

e. Monitor provider compliance with personnel security requirements.

In practice: Contractors and vendor staff have a named sponsor and an end date on their accounts, and their access is reviewed on a schedule; HR and procurement set the terms.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Contract terms and security requirements are usually owned by procurement and security.

  • Assess
  • Implement
  • Manage

External personnel are commonly managed through contractor lifecycle with sponsors, end dates and access review.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Joiner, mover and leaver workflow configuration and sample event records
  • Account-to-identity correlation report with unowned accounts
SC-2 SC: System and Communications Protection

Separation of System and User Functionality

Separate user functionality, including user interface services, from system management functionality.

In practice: Administrators use a separate account and admin portal, kept apart from the ordinary user interface; the platform team designs that separation.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Technical separation is usually a platform design matter.

  • Implement

Separation of user and system management functionality is commonly supported by separate administrative identities and administrative portal restrictions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • SailPoint IIQ
  • SailPoint ISC
  • Netwrix IDM
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Administrative account standard and inventory of separate administrative identities
SC-10 SC: System and Communications Protection

Network Disconnect

Terminate the network connection associated with a communications session at the end of the session or after [Assignment: organization-defined time period] of inactivity.

In practice: Network connections close after a period of inactivity set by the organization, and the identity session timeout is aligned with that period.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Network device configuration is usually the primary implementation point; identity contributes by aligning identity session timeouts with the network inactivity period.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Network disconnect after inactivity is commonly aligned with session timeout policy.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
SC-12 SC: System and Communications Protection

Cryptographic Key Establishment and Management

Establish and manage cryptographic keys when cryptography is employed within the system in accordance with the following key management requirements: [Assignment: organization-defined requirements for key generation, distribution, storage, access, and destruction].

In practice: The keys and certificates that sign identity tokens are generated, stored in a protected place and renewed before they expire; the security team owns key policy.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Supporting
Why this classification

Cryptographic key management is usually a broader program.

  • Implement
  • Assess

Key management for identity systems commonly includes signing certificate lifecycle for federation and vaulted keys.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
  • CyberArk / BeyondTrust / Delinea
Evidence commonly examined
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
  • Vault onboarding inventory and credential rotation records
SC-17 SC: System and Communications Protection

Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

a. Issue public key certificates under an [Assignment: organization-defined certificate policy] or obtain public key certificates from an approved service provider; and

b. Include only approved trust anchors in trust stores or certificate stores managed by the organization.

In practice: Certificates for devices and user sign-in come from an approved certificate authority under the organization's certificate policy, which the security team runs.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Certificate authority operation is usually owned by PKI administration.

  • Implement

Public key infrastructure certificates are commonly used for device and certificate-based user authentication.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Device registration and device-state policy export
  • Authentication method policy export, including phishing-resistant requirements
SC-23 SC: System and Communications Protection

Session Authenticity

Protect the authenticity of communications sessions.

In practice: Signed assertions and protected session tokens help show that a session belongs to the user who started it, while the network team secures the connection itself.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Supporting
Why this classification

Transport and application session protection is usually the primary implementation point.

  • Implement
  • Manage

Session authenticity is commonly supported by protection of session tokens, session binding and signed assertions.

Platform families that commonly provide relevant capabilities
  • Entra
  • Okta / Ping
Evidence commonly examined
  • Session lifetime and reauthentication interval policy export
  • Federation trust and application sign-on configuration export
AC-3(3) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Mandatory Access Control

Enforce [Assignment: organization-defined mandatory access control policy] over the set of covered subjects and objects specified in the policy, and where the policy:

(a) Is uniformly enforced across the covered subjects and objects within the system;

(b) Specifies that a subject that has been granted access to information is constrained from doing any of the following;

(1) Passing the information to unauthorized subjects or objects;

(2) Granting its privileges to other subjects;

(3) Changing one or more security attributes (specified by the policy) on subjects, objects, the system, or system components;

(4) Choosing the security attributes and attribute values (specified by the policy) to be associated with newly created or modified objects; and

(5) Changing the rules governing access control; and

(c) Specifies that [Assignment: organization-defined subjects] may explicitly be granted [Assignment: organization-defined privileges] such that they are not limited by any defined subset (or all) of the above constraints.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Access enforcement variant for information and data policy; ownership usually sits with data platform and application design.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-3(4) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Discretionary Access Control

Enforce [Assignment: organization-defined discretionary access control policy] over the set of covered subjects and objects specified in the policy, and where the policy specifies that a subject that has been granted access to information can do one or more of the following:

(a) Pass the information to any other subjects or objects;

(b) Grant its privileges to other subjects;

(c) Change security attributes on subjects, objects, the system, or the system’s components;

(d) Choose the security attributes to be associated with newly created or revised objects; or

(e) Change the rules governing access control.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Access enforcement variant for information and data policy; ownership usually sits with data platform and application design.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-3(5) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Security-relevant Information

Prevent access to [Assignment: organization-defined security-relevant information] except during secure, non-operable system states.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Access enforcement variant for information and data policy; ownership usually sits with data platform and application design.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-3(9) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Controlled Release

Release information outside of the system only if:

(a) The receiving [Assignment: organization-defined system or system component] provides [Assignment: organization-defined controls]; and

(b) [Assignment: organization-defined controls] are used to validate the appropriateness of the information designated for release.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Access enforcement variant for information and data policy; ownership usually sits with data platform and application design.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-3(11) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Restrict Access to Specific Information Types

Restrict access to data repositories containing [Assignment: organization-defined information types].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Access enforcement variant for information and data policy; ownership usually sits with data platform and application design.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-3(12) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Assert and Enforce Application Access

(a) Require applications to assert, as part of the installation process, the access needed to the following system applications and functions: [Assignment: organization-defined system applications and functions];

(b) Provide an enforcement mechanism to prevent unauthorized access; and

(c) Approve access changes after initial installation of the application.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Install-time permission declarations for device and system functions; ownership usually sits with endpoint, mobile and platform engineering.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-3(14) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Individual Access

Provide [Assignment: organization-defined mechanisms] to enable individuals to have access to the following elements of their personally identifiable information: [Assignment: organization-defined elements].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Access enforcement variant for information and data policy; ownership usually sits with data platform and application design.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-3(15) AC: Access Control

Access Enforcement | Discretionary and Mandatory Access Control

(a) Enforce [Assignment: organization-defined mandatory access control policy] over the set of covered subjects and objects specified in the policy; and

(b) Enforce [Assignment: organization-defined discretionary access control policy] over the set of covered subjects and objects specified in the policy.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Access enforcement variant for information and data policy; ownership usually sits with data platform and application design.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4 AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement

Enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of information within the system and between connected systems based on [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control policies].

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(1) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Object Security and Privacy Attributes

Use [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy attributes] associated with [Assignment: organization-defined information, source, and destination objects] to enforce [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control policies] as a basis for flow control decisions.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(2) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Processing Domains

Use protected processing domains to enforce [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control policies] as a basis for flow control decisions.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(3) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Dynamic Information Flow Control

Enforce [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control policies].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(4) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Flow Control of Encrypted Information

Prevent encrypted information from bypassing [Assignment: organization-defined information flow control mechanisms] by [Selection (one or more): decrypting the information; blocking the flow of the encrypted information; terminating communications sessions attempting to pass encrypted information; [Assignment: organization-defined procedure or method]].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(5) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Embedded Data Types

Enforce [Assignment: organization-defined limitations] on embedding data types within other data types.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(6) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Metadata

Enforce information flow control based on [Assignment: organization-defined metadata].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(7) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | One-way Flow Mechanisms

Enforce one-way information flows through hardware-based flow control mechanisms.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(8) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Security and Privacy Policy Filters

(a) Enforce information flow control using [Assignment: organization-defined security or privacy policy filters] as a basis for flow control decisions for [Assignment: organization-defined information flows]; and

(b) [Selection (one or more): block; strip; modify; quarantine] data after a filter processing failure in accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined security or privacy policy].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(9) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Human Reviews

Enforce the use of human reviews for [Assignment: organization-defined information flows] under the following conditions: [Assignment: organization-defined conditions].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(10) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Enable and Disable Security or Privacy Policy Filters

Provide the capability for privileged administrators to enable and disable [Assignment: organization-defined security or privacy policy filters] under the following conditions: [Assignment: organization-defined conditions].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(11) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Configuration of Security or Privacy Policy Filters

Provide the capability for privileged administrators to configure [Assignment: organization-defined security or privacy policy filters] to support different security or privacy policies.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(12) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Data Type Identifiers

When transferring information between different security domains, use [Assignment: organization-defined data type identifiers] to validate data essential for information flow decisions.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(13) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Decomposition into Policy-relevant Subcomponents

When transferring information between different security domains, decompose information into [Assignment: organization-defined policy-relevant subcomponents] for submission to policy enforcement mechanisms.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(14) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Security or Privacy Policy Filter Constraints

When transferring information between different security domains, implement [Assignment: organization-defined security or privacy policy filters] requiring fully enumerated formats that restrict data structure and content.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(15) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Detection of Unsanctioned Information

When transferring information between different security domains, examine the information for the presence of [Assignment: organization-defined unsanctioned information] and prohibit the transfer of such information in accordance with the [Assignment: organization-defined security or privacy policy].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(19) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Validation of Metadata

When transferring information between different security domains, implement [Assignment: organization-defined security or privacy policy filters] on metadata.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(20) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Approved Solutions

Employ [Assignment: organization-defined solutions in approved configurations] to control the flow of [Assignment: organization-defined information] across security domains.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(21) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows

Separate information flows logically or physically using [Assignment: organization-defined mechanisms and/or techniques] to accomplish [Assignment: organization-defined required separations by types of information].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(22) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Access Only

Provide access from a single device to computing platforms, applications, or data residing in multiple different security domains, while preventing information flow between the different security domains.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(23) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Modify Non-releasable Information

When transferring information between different security domains, modify non-releasable information by implementing [Assignment: organization-defined modification action].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(24) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Internal Normalized Format

When transferring information between different security domains, parse incoming data into an internal normalized format and regenerate the data to be consistent with its intended specification.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(25) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Data Sanitization

When transferring information between different security domains, sanitize data to minimize [Selection (one or more): delivery of malicious content, command and control of malicious code, malicious code augmentation, and steganography-encoded data; spillage of sensitive information] in accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined policy].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(26) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Audit Filtering Actions

When transferring information between different security domains, record and audit content filtering actions and results for the information being filtered.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(27) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Redundant/Independent Filtering Mechanisms

When transferring information between different security domains, implement content filtering solutions that provide redundant and independent filtering mechanisms for each data type.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(28) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Linear Filter Pipelines

When transferring information between different security domains, implement a linear content filter pipeline that is enforced with discretionary and mandatory access controls.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(29) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Filter Orchestration Engines

When transferring information between different security domains, employ content filter orchestration engines to ensure that:

(a) Content filtering mechanisms successfully complete execution without errors; and

(b) Content filtering actions occur in the correct order and comply with [Assignment: organization-defined policy].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(30) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Filter Mechanisms Using Multiple Processes

When transferring information between different security domains, implement content filtering mechanisms using multiple processes.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(31) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Failed Content Transfer Prevention

When transferring information between different security domains, prevent the transfer of failed content to the receiving domain.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-4(32) AC: Access Control

Information Flow Enforcement | Process Requirements for Information Transfer

When transferring information between different security domains, the process that transfers information between filter pipelines:

(a) Does not filter message content;

(b) Validates filtering metadata;

(c) Ensures the content associated with the filtering metadata has successfully completed filtering; and

(d) Transfers the content to the destination filter pipeline.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information flow enforcement. In GCA's classification, primary implementation usually sits with network and data security architecture; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-6(4) AC: Access Control

Least Privilege | Separate Processing Domains

Provide separate processing domains to enable finer-grained allocation of user privileges.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Access control mechanism detail that GCA classifies as outside identity scope; ownership usually sits with platform and application owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-7(2) AC: Access Control

Unsuccessful Logon Attempts | Purge or Wipe Mobile Device

Purge or wipe information from [Assignment: organization-defined mobile devices] based on [Assignment: organization-defined purging or wiping requirements and techniques] after [Assignment: organization-defined number] consecutive, unsuccessful device logon attempts.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Device-specific lockout behavior; ownership usually sits with endpoint and mobile device management.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-7(3) AC: Access Control

Unsuccessful Logon Attempts | Biometric Attempt Limiting

Limit the number of unsuccessful biometric logon attempts to [Assignment: organization-defined number].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Device and authenticator lockout behavior; ownership usually sits with endpoint and authenticator platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-8 AC: Access Control

System Use Notification

a. Display [Assignment: organization-defined system use notification message or banner] to users before granting access to the system that provides privacy and security notices consistent with applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines and state that:

1. Users are accessing a U.S. Government system;

2. System usage may be monitored, recorded, and subject to audit;

3. Unauthorized use of the system is prohibited and subject to criminal and civil penalties; and

4. Use of the system indicates consent to monitoring and recording;

b. Retain the notification message or banner on the screen until users acknowledge the usage conditions and take explicit actions to log on to or further access the system; and

c. For publicly accessible systems:

1. Display system use information [Assignment: organization-defined conditions], before granting further access to the publicly accessible system;

2. Display references, if any, to monitoring, recording, or auditing that are consistent with privacy accommodations for such systems that generally prohibit those activities; and

3. Include a description of the authorized uses of the system.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

System use notification (banner); ownership usually sits with application and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-9 AC: Access Control

Previous Logon Notification

Notify the user, upon successful logon to the system, of the date and time of the last logon.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Logon notification detail; ownership usually sits with application and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-9(1) AC: Access Control

Previous Logon Notification | Unsuccessful Logons

Notify the user, upon successful logon, of the number of unsuccessful logon attempts since the last successful logon.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Logon notification detail; ownership usually sits with application owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-9(2) AC: Access Control

Previous Logon Notification | Successful and Unsuccessful Logons

Notify the user, upon successful logon, of the number of [Selection: successful logons; unsuccessful logon attempts; both] during [Assignment: organization-defined time period].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Logon notification detail; ownership usually sits with application owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-9(4) AC: Access Control

Previous Logon Notification | Additional Logon Information

Notify the user, upon successful logon, of the following additional information: [Assignment: organization-defined additional information].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Logon notification detail; ownership usually sits with application owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-11 AC: Access Control

Device Lock

a. Prevent further access to the system by [Selection (one or more): initiating a device lock after [Assignment: organization-defined time period] of inactivity; requiring the user to initiate a device lock before leaving the system unattended]; and

b. Retain the device lock until the user reestablishes access using established identification and authentication procedures.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Device lock behavior; ownership usually sits with endpoint management.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-11(1) AC: Access Control

Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays

Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Device lock behavior; ownership usually sits with endpoint management.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-12(2) AC: Access Control

Session Termination | Termination Message

Display an explicit logout message to users indicating the termination of authenticated communications sessions.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Session termination message behavior; ownership usually sits with application owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-12(3) AC: Access Control

Session Termination | Timeout Warning Message

Display an explicit message to users indicating that the session will end in [Assignment: organization-defined time until end of session].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Session termination message behavior; ownership usually sits with application owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-16(1) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Dynamic Attribute Association

Dynamically associate security and privacy attributes with [Assignment: organization-defined subjects and objects] in accordance with the following security and privacy policies as information is created and combined: [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy policies].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Binding of security attributes to information objects; ownership usually sits with data and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-16(3) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Maintenance of Attribute Associations by System

Maintain the association and integrity of [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy attributes] to [Assignment: organization-defined subjects and objects].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Binding of security attributes to information objects; ownership usually sits with data and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-16(4) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Association of Attributes by Authorized Individuals

Provide the capability to associate [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy attributes] with [Assignment: organization-defined subjects and objects] by authorized individuals (or processes acting on behalf of individuals).

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Binding of security attributes to information objects; ownership usually sits with data and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-16(5) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Attribute Displays on Objects to Be Output

Display security and privacy attributes in human-readable form on each object that the system transmits to output devices to identify [Assignment: organization-defined special dissemination, handling, or distribution instructions] using [Assignment: organization-defined human-readable, standard naming conventions].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Binding of security attributes to information objects; ownership usually sits with data and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-16(6) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Maintenance of Attribute Association

Require personnel to associate and maintain the association of [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy attributes] with [Assignment: organization-defined subjects and objects] in accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy policies].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Binding of security attributes to information objects; ownership usually sits with data and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-16(7) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Consistent Attribute Interpretation

Provide a consistent interpretation of security and privacy attributes transmitted between distributed system components.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Binding of security attributes to information objects; ownership usually sits with data and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-16(8) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Association Techniques and Technologies

Implement [Assignment: organization-defined techniques and technologies] in associating security and privacy attributes to information.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Binding of security attributes to information objects; ownership usually sits with data and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-16(9) AC: Access Control

Security and Privacy Attributes | Attribute Reassignment — Regrading Mechanisms

Change security and privacy attributes associated with information only via regrading mechanisms validated using [Assignment: organization-defined techniques or procedures].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Binding of security attributes to information objects; ownership usually sits with data and platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-17(2) AC: Access Control

Remote Access | Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption

Implement cryptographic mechanisms to protect the confidentiality and integrity of remote access sessions.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Remote access cryptography and network control points; ownership usually sits with network engineering.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-17(3) AC: Access Control

Remote Access | Managed Access Control Points

Route remote accesses through authorized and managed network access control points.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Remote access cryptography and network control points; ownership usually sits with network engineering.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-17(6) AC: Access Control

Remote Access | Protection of Mechanism Information

Protect information about remote access mechanisms from unauthorized use and disclosure.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Protection of information about remote access mechanisms; ownership usually sits with network engineering and security operations.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-18(3) AC: Access Control

Wireless Access | Disable Wireless Networking

Disable, when not intended for use, wireless networking capabilities embedded within system components prior to issuance and deployment.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Wireless configuration; ownership usually sits with network engineering.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-18(4) AC: Access Control

Wireless Access | Restrict Configurations by Users

Identify and explicitly authorize users allowed to independently configure wireless networking capabilities.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Wireless configuration; ownership usually sits with network engineering.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-18(5) AC: Access Control

Wireless Access | Antennas and Transmission Power Levels

Select radio antennas and calibrate transmission power levels to reduce the probability that signals from wireless access points can be received outside of organization-controlled boundaries.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Wireless configuration; ownership usually sits with network engineering.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-19(4) AC: Access Control

Access Control for Mobile Devices | Restrictions for Classified Information

(a) Prohibit the use of unclassified mobile devices in facilities containing systems processing, storing, or transmitting classified information unless specifically permitted by the authorizing official; and

(b) Enforce the following restrictions on individuals permitted by the authorizing official to use unclassified mobile devices in facilities containing systems processing, storing, or transmitting classified information:

(1) Connection of unclassified mobile devices to classified systems is prohibited;

(2) Connection of unclassified mobile devices to unclassified systems requires approval from the authorizing official;

(3) Use of internal or external modems or wireless interfaces within the unclassified mobile devices is prohibited; and

(4) Unclassified mobile devices and the information stored on those devices are subject to random reviews and inspections by [Assignment: organization-defined security officials], and if classified information is found, the incident handling policy is followed.

(c) Restrict the connection of classified mobile devices to classified systems in accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined security policies].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Mobile device configuration; ownership usually sits with endpoint management.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-19(5) AC: Access Control

Access Control for Mobile Devices | Full Device or Container-based Encryption

Employ [Selection: full-device encryption; container-based encryption] to protect the confidentiality and integrity of information on [Assignment: organization-defined mobile devices].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Mobile device configuration; ownership usually sits with endpoint management.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-20(1) AC: Access Control

Use of External Systems | Limits on Authorized Use

Permit authorized individuals to use an external system to access the system or to process, store, or transmit organization-controlled information only after:

(a) Verification of the implementation of controls on the external system as specified in the organization’s security and privacy policies and security and privacy plans; or

(b) Retention of approved system connection or processing agreements with the organizational entity hosting the external system.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Verification of controls on external systems and connection or processing agreements; ownership usually sits with security assessment, procurement and system owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-20(2) AC: Access Control

Use of External Systems | Portable Storage Devices — Restricted Use

Restrict the use of organization-controlled portable storage devices by authorized individuals on external systems using [Assignment: organization-defined restrictions].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Portable and network storage limits on external systems; ownership usually sits with endpoint and data protection teams.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-20(4) AC: Access Control

Use of External Systems | Network Accessible Storage Devices — Prohibited Use

Prohibit the use of [Assignment: organization-defined network accessible storage devices] in external systems.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Portable and network storage limits on external systems; ownership usually sits with endpoint and data protection teams.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-20(5) AC: Access Control

Use of External Systems | Portable Storage Devices — Prohibited Use

Prohibit the use of organization-controlled portable storage devices by authorized individuals on external systems.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Portable and network storage limits on external systems; ownership usually sits with endpoint and data protection teams.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-21 AC: Access Control

Information Sharing

a. Enable authorized users to determine whether access authorizations assigned to a sharing partner match the information’s access and use restrictions for [Assignment: organization-defined information sharing circumstances where user discretion is required]; and

b. Employ [Assignment: organization-defined automated mechanisms or manual processes] to assist users in making information sharing and collaboration decisions.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information sharing decisions; ownership usually sits with data owners and records management.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-21(1) AC: Access Control

Information Sharing | Automated Decision Support

Employ [Assignment: organization-defined automated mechanisms] to enforce information-sharing decisions by authorized users based on access authorizations of sharing partners and access restrictions on information to be shared.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information sharing decisions; ownership usually sits with data owners and records management.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-21(2) AC: Access Control

Information Sharing | Information Search and Retrieval

Implement information search and retrieval services that enforce [Assignment: organization-defined information sharing restrictions].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Information sharing decisions; ownership usually sits with data owners and records management.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-22 AC: Access Control

Publicly Accessible Content

a. Designate individuals authorized to make information publicly accessible;

b. Train authorized individuals to ensure that publicly accessible information does not contain nonpublic information;

c. Review the proposed content of information prior to posting onto the publicly accessible system to ensure that nonpublic information is not included; and

d. Review the content on the publicly accessible system for nonpublic information [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and remove such information, if discovered.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Publicly accessible content review; ownership usually sits with communications and web owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-23 AC: Access Control

Data Mining Protection

Employ [Assignment: organization-defined data mining prevention and detection techniques] for [Assignment: organization-defined data storage objects] to detect and protect against unauthorized data mining.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Data mining protection; ownership usually sits with data platform owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-24(2) AC: Access Control

Access Control Decisions | No User or Process Identity

Enforce access control decisions based on [Assignment: organization-defined security or privacy attributes] that do not include the identity of the user or process acting on behalf of the user.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Access control decision detail; ownership usually sits with application design.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
AC-25 AC: Access Control

Reference Monitor

Implement a reference monitor for [Assignment: organization-defined access control policies] that is tamperproof, always invoked, and small enough to be subject to analysis and testing, the completeness of which can be assured.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Reference monitor design; ownership usually sits with platform and operating system engineering.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
IA-3(3) IA: Identification and Authentication

Device Identification and Authentication | Dynamic Address Allocation

(a) Where addresses are allocated dynamically, standardize dynamic address allocation lease information and the lease duration assigned to devices in accordance with [Assignment: organization-defined lease information and lease duration]; and

(b) Audit lease information when assigned to a device.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Network address allocation for device identification; ownership usually sits with network engineering.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
IA-5(12) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Biometric Authentication Performance

For biometric-based authentication, employ mechanisms that satisfy the following biometric quality requirements [Assignment: organization-defined biometric quality requirements].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Authenticator property that GCA classifies as outside identity scope; ownership usually sits with platform, cryptographic and biometric program owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
IA-5(14) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Managing Content of PKI Trust Stores

For PKI-based authentication, employ an organization-wide methodology for managing the content of PKI trust stores installed across all platforms, including networks, operating systems, browsers, and applications.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

In GCA's classification, management of PKI trust store content usually sits with PKI administration and platform owners; no identity contribution is typical. Certificate-based authentication is covered under SC-17.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
IA-5(15) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | GSA-approved Products and Services

Use only General Services Administration-approved products and services for identity, credential, and access management.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Federal procurement requirement that GCA classifies as outside identity scope; ownership usually sits with agency acquisition and the ICAM program office.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
IA-5(17) IA: Identification and Authentication

Authenticator Management | Presentation Attack Detection for Biometric Authenticators

Employ presentation attack detection mechanisms for biometric-based authentication.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Authenticator property that GCA classifies as outside identity scope; ownership usually sits with platform, cryptographic and biometric program owners.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
IA-7 IA: Identification and Authentication

Cryptographic Module Authentication

Implement mechanisms for authentication to a cryptographic module that meet the requirements of applicable laws, executive orders, directives, policies, regulations, standards, and guidelines for such authentication.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Cryptographic module authentication; ownership usually sits with cryptographic engineering.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
IA-8(6) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identification and Authentication (Non-organizational Users) | Disassociability

Implement the following measures to disassociate user attributes or identifier assertion relationships among individuals, credential service providers, and relying parties: [Assignment: organization-defined measures].

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline None
  • SP 800-53B baseline None
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Federal acceptance profile detail; ownership usually sits with the sponsoring federal program.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
IA-12(4) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Proofing | In-person Validation and Verification

Require that the validation and verification of identity evidence be conducted in person before a designated registration authority.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline High
  • SP 800-53B baseline High
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Proofing method detail (in-person or address based); ownership usually sits with human resources and the proofing provider.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
IA-12(5) IA: Identification and Authentication

Identity Proofing | Address Confirmation

Require that a [Selection: registration code; notice of proofing] be delivered through an out-of-band channel to verify the users address (physical or digital) of record.

  • Control type Enhancement
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Moderate
  • SP 800-53B baseline Moderate
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Proofing method detail (in-person or address based); ownership usually sits with human resources and the proofing provider.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
PS-2 PS: Personnel Security

Position Risk Designation

a. Assign a risk designation to all organizational positions;

b. Establish screening criteria for individuals filling those positions; and

c. Review and update position risk designations [Assignment: organization-defined frequency].

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

In GCA's classification, position risk designation usually sits with human resources and the security program; no identity contribution is typical.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
PS-8 PS: Personnel Security

Personnel Sanctions

a. Employ a formal sanctions process for individuals failing to comply with established information security and privacy policies and procedures; and

b. Notify [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] within [Assignment: organization-defined time period] when a formal employee sanctions process is initiated, identifying the individual sanctioned and the reason for the sanction.

  • Control type Base
  • FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline Low
  • SP 800-53B baseline Low
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
Why this classification

Personnel sanctions are usually a human resources process; ownership usually sits with human resources and management.

Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable

Summary

Primary
49
Identity platforms or processes are typically the principal means of implementing the requirement.
Supporting
72
Another discipline owns the requirement. Identity configuration or evidence contributes.
Outside identity scope (GCA classification)
88
Listed for completeness, with a one-line note on what the requirement is.

How to read the matrix

Control type
Base control, or control enhancement, as numbered by NIST (for example AC-2 and AC-2(1)). Withdrawn controls and enhancements are omitted.
FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline
The lowest FedRAMP Rev 5 baseline whose published control list includes this control or enhancement. In the published lists every Low control is also in Moderate and High, and every Moderate control is also in High. The value none means the control is in none of the three lists. Inclusion reflects FedRAMP's selection and says nothing about the authorization status of any cloud service.
SP 800-53B baseline
The lowest NIST SP 800-53B security control baseline (Low, Moderate or High) that includes this control or enhancement, from the NIST OSCAL baseline profiles for Rev 5. The value none means it is in none of the three baselines. Baselines are a starting point that organizations tailor.
Identity relevance

Identity relevance is a GCA classification of whether identity capabilities are typically the principal means of implementing a requirement (Primary), contribute to a requirement owned by another discipline (Supporting), or usually sit outside identity work (Outside identity scope (GCA classification)).

It describes where primary implementation ownership usually sits. It is not a statement about whether identity configuration could be relevant to a particular incident, finding or environment. Every "Outside identity scope (GCA classification)" classification carries a rationale, and other classifications show one where GCA has recorded it, under "Why this classification" beside the label.

Platform families
Product families that commonly provide capabilities relevant to a requirement. A blank cell means GCA has not mapped a platform family to the requirement. It does not mean a product lacks a capability.
Evidence
Examples of artifacts commonly examined. The list is not complete, and it is not a statement that any artifact is sufficient. Assessors determine sufficiency.

Important notice

Purpose. This NIST 800-53 Rev 5 identity traceability matrix is general educational reference material, written by Robert Ivey and published by GCA Technology Services ("GCA") to help organizations plan identity and access management work. It is not legal, audit, accounting or compliance advice, and it is not a substitute for advice from qualified professionals who know your environment.

No compliance determination. Whether an organization meets a requirement is decided by the applicable assessor, auditor, certifying body or regulator, applying the governing requirements to that organization's actual systems, policies and evidence. Nothing in this matrix states or implies that any organization, product, service or configuration meets or complies with any requirement, or that any assessment, audit, examination or certification will have any particular outcome.

Classifications are practice opinion. Relevance classifications, offering mappings, platform mappings and evidence examples are the author's professional judgment as of the date shown. They are not regulatory classifications and are not statements of the standard of care. Other qualified practitioners may reasonably classify requirements differently, and the right answer for a given environment depends on its facts.

Evidence examples are illustrative. Evidence listed is an example of artifacts commonly examined. It is not a complete list, and it is not a statement that any artifact is sufficient. Assessors determine sufficiency.

Source text controls. Requirement text and references come from the sources listed on this page. Where this matrix differs from a source, the source controls. Regulations, guidance and assessment methods change, so confirm current requirements with the issuing authority before relying on them.

Products and services. Platform names identify product families that commonly provide capabilities relevant to a requirement. A blank cell means GCA has not mapped that platform family to the requirement. It does not mean the product lacks a capability. GCA makes no representation about any third party's products, features, roadmaps or government authorization status, including FedRAMP, DoD Impact Levels and similar programs. Confirm capabilities with the vendor and authorization status with the authorizing program.

GCA services. Offering descriptions identify the type of GCA service that addresses an area. The scope, deliverables, terms and outcomes of any GCA engagement are defined only by a signed agreement and Statement of Work, and this page does not change those terms.

No relationship; no reliance. Reading or using this matrix does not create a client, advisory or other relationship with GCA or the author. To the fullest extent permitted by law, this material is provided "as is," without warranties of any kind, express or implied, including accuracy, completeness, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, and GCA is not liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance on it.

No client data. This matrix contains no client data. Any example organization is fictitious.

FedRAMP baselines. FedRAMP is a program of the U.S. General Services Administration. FedRAMP baseline lists are shown for reference only, and this page does not describe any cloud service or GCA engagement as holding a FedRAMP designation.

Version 1 · Prepared · Last reviewed · Reviewed every 90 days · View changelog

Microsoft and Microsoft Entra are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies. SailPoint, IdentityIQ and Identity Security Cloud are trademarks or product names of SailPoint Technologies, Inc. or its affiliates. Netwrix is a trademark of Netwrix Corporation. Okta is a trademark of Okta, Inc. Ping Identity is a trademark of Ping Identity Corporation. CyberArk is a trademark of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. or its affiliates. BeyondTrust is a trademark of BeyondTrust Corporation. Delinea is a trademark of Delinea Inc. NIST is an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce and does not endorse this page. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners. These names identify products and programs only and do not imply endorsement by, sponsorship by or affiliation with any of these companies or programs, except where a GCA partnership is expressly stated elsewhere on gca.net.

Changelog

  1. Version 1: First publication.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this page show that a system is FedRAMP authorized?

No. The FedRAMP facet shows which controls appear in the published Rev 5 Low, Moderate and High baseline lists. That membership says nothing about the authorization status of any cloud service or any GCA engagement. Authorization decisions are made by the authorizing official of a sponsoring agency or through the FedRAMP program, based on an assessment of the specific system.

Why does the matrix cover the AC and IA families in full?

Those families cover account lifecycle, least privilege, session control and authenticator management, which identity teams run day to day. The AU, PS and SC rows are limited to 18 base controls and one enhancement, PS-4(2), where identity work commonly contributes.

Which release is this matrix based on?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, release 5.2.0, dated August 27, 2025. Confirm current control text with NIST before you rely on it, because NIST revises its publications.

Does a 'contributes to' classification mean a control is met?

No. It means identity work is typically the primary implementation, or a supporting input to a control owned by another discipline. Whether a system meets a control is decided by the assessor who examines that system and its evidence.